Miller 4, Kyrsti L. Authors are encouraged to respond openly to the peer review reports, which are published with the article, and can publish revised versions of their article, if they wish. Prices for a full monograph start from £10,000 / €12,000 / $12,500 (USD), plus applicable taxes, and from £5,000 / €6,000 / $6,250 (USD) to publish a short-form book open access (books between 25-50,000 words). Discover the peer review process and how it works . Kevin O’Grady. My research draws on the disciplines of political science, anthropology, geography, social theory and media studies. $155. Active Learning in Higher Education 15(2): 157–71. ” He said. The Routledge Handbook of African Theatre and Performance brings together the very latest international research on the performing arts across the continent and the diaspora into one expansive and wide-ranging collection. Contact us +1 323-425-8868: customer@scirp. Founded in 1836, we have published many of the greatest thinkers and scholars of the last hundred years, including Adorno, Einstein, Russell, Popper, Wittgenstein, Jung, Bohm, Hayek, McLuhan, Marcuse and Sartre. Explore journals and articles by subject. Data source: Frontiers’ surveys, January to December 2022. Typically defined as “an unpleasant psychological state in reaction to perceived stress concerning the performance of a task under pressure”,3 anxiety is a common emotional state experienced by athletes at all levels of performance. I was excited by the prospect and quickly agreed. The WRNA is the only validated, peer-reviewed risk/needs assessment developed for justice-involved women. . $52. Hamed Hosseini, James Goodman, Sara C. INVITED CONTRIBUTION Peer mentoring is an increasingly popular criminal justice intervention in custodial and community settings. don’t peer review; that quality is somehow ‘lower’ in some unspecified way; that commercial publishing is akin to vanity publishing. The journal’s policy is to have manuscripts reviewed by two expert reviewers. See full list on routledge. Adelphi Series. Read the Instructions for Authors for information on how to submit your article. Most of the research on cyberbullying has taken place in schools and we can gain a great deal of knowledge from this literature about the phenomenon []. Verified account Protected Tweets @; Suggested usersPeer supervision brings unique challenges though, including the possibility of collusion or stagnating at a shared developmental level. Your name and affiliation are published alongside your peer review report, allowing readers to acknowledge your contribution. Research articles published in The Design Journal have undergone peer review. This meta-analysis reviews the literature to-date focusing on the relationship between reported racism and mental and physical health outcomes. The invited reviewer should declare any competing interest before submitting their report to the journal. Although a number of narrative or qualitative reviews of female reentry programs have been published, this article specifically addresses the results from a series of meta-analyses. Rick E. T1 - 'Studentification': the. faster peer review. Scholarly books have: 1. It's not easy getting published, but everyone has to do it. Two decades of research in L2 peer review. How to publish your work open access, key contact details, and third-party permissions. Peer mentoring is an increasingly popular criminal justice intervention in custodial and community settings. Find out what they told us in Peer. Find out what they told us in Peer. Apr 29, 2023. NO 800 number. As long as general scholarly conventions are followed, submissions are not required to be in the journal style, although footnotes are. R. Establishing a sense of social connectedness is an integral. Topping et al. Abingdon/New York: Routledge, 2005, 231 pp. We also provide a critical interpretation of. In general, anxiety is made up of cognitive (e. They may feed back areas that need a little work for the proposal to be ready for external review. At times, the voluntary job will require more work than you expect. Routledge Studies in Global Student Mobility offers a scholarly forum for original and innovative research which explores, explains, and increases understanding of issues and opportunities relating to international student mobility in K-12, higher education, and beyond. Reviewing peer review. This shows the editor how you interpreted the manuscript and will highlight any major differences in perspective between you and the other reviewers. Adelphi Papers, The. Philip Andrews. PUBLISHED 03 Oct 2023. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed original research reports, briefer empirical reports, and theoretical and review articles provided the latter represent a new and original contribution, rather than merely surveys of literature or summaries of previous research. 128–43. The Corporate Brand Identity Matrix (Urde, 2013; Greyser & Urde, 2019) provides a structure and logic for this discovery with topics and questions to be further developed and discussed during the course. Peer review has been conceptualized as a social judgment process of individuals and their products within a defined social group (Bornmann 2008). But in the American context, these debates often led to a reaffirmation of some variant of American exceptionalism with the consequent exorcism of race within the avowed norms and policy goals of American politics. Despite the acknowledged importance, current incentives in scientific publishing are not towards doing. Take nothing for granted. Volume 354, Number 1, January 01, 2003 - Volume 48, Number 398, 1 May 2008. DovePress are open access specialists with a focus on publishing medicine in a suite of peer-reviewed journals. 99 (pbk). Visit the Taylor & Francis Newsroom to stay up to date on everything at Taylor & Francis, including: Routledge, CRC Press, journals, books, and company news. Online discoverability: our. 2. These include invited and open peer review, article versioning, archiving and indexing. Peer Review Policy All papers in PMR have undergone rigorous peer review, based upon an initial editorial screening followed by a minimum of double-blind peer review. This will also help you keep your comments organized. e. Adelphi Papers, The. , worrying thoughts and apprehensions). Routledge is a global publisher of academic books, journals and online resources in the humanities and social sciences. Peer review and manuscript handling . Prior research has primarily examined the learning benefits that result from the receipt of feedback reviews, with few studies specifically exploring the merits of producing. PUBLISHED 03 Oct 2023. S. 95; Hardback: $165. Authors can choose to publish gold open access in this journal. Gibbs Reflective Cycle. Prior meta-analyses and literature reviews in the field of peer tutoring mentioned previously were also consulted in order to corroborate that the keywords used in the first search had been appropriate. Mission & overview. A succinct. A meta-analysis (435 studies, k = 994, N > 61,000) of empirical research on the effects of feedback on student learning was conducted with the purpose of replicating and expanding the Visible Learning research (Hattie and Timperley, 2007; Hattie, 2009; Hattie and Zierer, 2019) from meta-synthesis. In order to facilitate an anonymized review process, we request that there not be any author. Click Go! to execute the search. Abstract. 3) Skim the paper very quickly to get a general sense of the article. : Boud, David, Ruth Cohen, Sampson, Jane (all of the University of Technology, Sydney, Australia) Routledge, May 1, 2014 - Education - 196 pages. Methods Using publicly available data, we provide an estimate of researchers’ time and the salary-based contribution to the journal. Using an integrative literature review, this study reviewed SWOT studies historically, providing a greater understanding of the SWOT analysis in different sectors and the different approaches used in SWOT studies. 00 December 2015 Journal of Second Language. Keywords: Peer Coaching; Peer Learning; Peer Review. Cultural beliefs and values provide guidance for how peers judge and. Subject to your Editor's approval, your proposal will then undergo an external peer review process in which experts are engaged to provide feedback on the quality and scope of your work, before your work is submitted to the Publishing Committee (or Editorial Board) for final approval. About the IEP. For our round-table review of Religious Education as a Dialogue with Difference, we have asked four scholars of different backgrounds to offer an individual critical appraisal of the book. Administrative Theory & Praxis. Despite criticisms, peer review is still the only widely accepted method for research validation and. What is the peer-review procedure for Taylor & Francis Books Open Access titles? Taylor & Francis is committed to the highest standards of peer-review in order to maintain our reputation for scholarly rigour and quality control and this is equally true for any Open Access book titles. ‘ Child Pornography and Child Nudity: Why and How States may Constitutionally Regulate the Production, Possession and Distribution of Nude Visual Depictions of Children ’, Temple Law Review 71: 609–35. Routledge Open Research Page 1 of 5 Routledge Open Research 2022, 1:3 Last updated: 29 SEP 2022London: Routledge, p. Clear communication between the journal and the reviewers is essential to facilitate consistent, fair and timely review. There is no number to call for support. faster peer review. Peer-Review Resources; Open Special Issues; Open Access Statement; Frequently Asked Questions; Follow SCIRP. ” Routledge Handbook of Urban Disaster Resilience. PUBLISHED 24 Oct 2023 Essay metrics State versus tribal borders: Problems of irredentism in modern Libyan state-building process [version 1; peer review: 2. This is something you should discuss with your editor at the proposal stage. Chou 2, Jon E. Journal metrics Editorial board. Taylor & Francis/Routledge are committed to the widest possible dissemination of its journals to non-profit institutions in developing. Each issue includes reviews of recent books, monographs, and atlases in geography and related fields. Gills. Its unique approach is theorised and practical. Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer-review Fiction of new China (1949–1966) Fang, X. Yet education professionals often remain unfamiliar with the principles necessary to guarantee its effectiveness. Beginning work Refining the argument Engaging with reviewers and editors Writing for Peer Reviewed Journals uses a wide range of multi-disciplinary examples from the writing workshops the authors have run in universities around the world: including the UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, South Africa, Norway, Sweden, Denmark and the. S. Abingdon: Routledge. 3) The Review Process. 1 review. 1 The peer review system in. The proposal will be read by the Routledge Research editor who may discuss it with other editors and marketing colleagues within Routledge and possibly with a series editor if that is appropriate. This leading article aims at Making a Difference (MAD) by inspiring to engage in new conventions for leadership and organizational change at a time when there is an opening for new practices to emerge. Peer Review Policy: All research articles in this journal have undergone rigorous peer review, based on initial editor screening and anonymized refereeing by at least two anonymous referees. More recently, there has been an upsurge of interest in cyberbullying among post-16 students, whether in further education (college) or higher. The book takes a 360˚ approach to the subject, combining analysis of current. F1000Research is an open research publishing Platform for researchers in all subject areas. , 2023 , The Routledge Handbook of Linguistic Prescriptivism. Book Review | Published online: 6 Apr 2023. Due to this it is, at times, considered with less prestige, argues Tanya Golash-Boza an Associate Professor at University of California, Merced in ‘How to Publish an Academic Book – Why Choosing a Publisher is Important and How to Choose One’. I am the author of a number of books including Husserl’s Phenomenology (Stanford 2003), Subjectivity and Selfhood (MIT Press 2005), The Phenomenological Mind together with S. She recalls an old American dream—of high school popularity contests, apple pies, dreamy boys next door, and a very old, very white, Christian nation. Converting your book or. Writing for Peer Reviewed Journals presents an insider's perspective on the secret business of academic publishing, making explicit many of the dilemmas and struggles faced by all writers, but rarely discussed. Although many books go through some type of review process, most books are not clearly identified as peer-reviewed or non-peer-reviewed; determining what type of review process a particular book went through is more than. By Paul Lowe. Peer review of work is the bas is of scientific publications. Despite the growth of peer mentoring internationally, remarkably little research has been done in this. Your research funder or institution may require you to publish your article open access and our open select journals give you the flexibility of publishing in a journal that best fits your research while complying with your open access. Routledge monograph cover designs Routledge template cover designs Routledge (International) Handbook/Companion example Focus (short form) example. They ensure that all submissions get the same treatment by following ethical guidelines. Writing for Peer Reviewed Journals: Strategies for Getting Published. It encompasses books in all subjects covered by. US. The journal aims to identify, examine and compare issues, problems, and policies related to adolescents and youth throughout the world. Authors can choose to publish gold open access in this journal. Proposal guidelines. Edited By Kene Igweonu. Aphasiology is concerned with all aspects of neurogenic language impairment, related disorders and disability. Administrative Theory & Praxis. Research Methods in Education. 3)TheReviewProcessSocial connectedness is ‘a short-term experience of belonging and relatedness, based on quantitative and qualitative social appraisals and relationship salience’ (van Bel, Smolders, Ijsselsteijn, & Kort, Reference van Bel, Smolders, Ijsselsteijn and de Kort 2011, p. Proposal • Read about our products, customers, readers, and publishing processes PEER REVIEWED O’Donovan, Kristin and Thomas A. Review articles, commentaries and book reviews are reviewed by the journal editors only. Peers have been alternately blamed for some of the more problematic aspects of adolescent functioning and praised for contributing to adolescent health and well-being. women overall (39. Writing for Peer Reviewed Journals: Strategies for getting published. Borchelt is Lecturer in Science Policy and Politics at The Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, Maryland, USA. £90 (hbk), £22. Routledge, London and New York, 2020. Read the Instructions for Authors for information on how to submit your article. Currently, the focus is primarily centered on websites and online services associated with the public sector. Scroll down to Source Types and select “Reviews”. We examine key characteristics of this literature, including study methods, participant characteristics, racism exposure instruments, and health outcomes. The Editor will assess the strengths of your proposal and how well it fits with the subject list. Dec. , 2019; Allana et al. Editors are the first point of contact for a journal. org +86 18163351462(WhatsApp) 1655362766: Paper Publishing WeChat:Strategies include peer debriefing with fellow researchers and scholars or experts in the field or methodology; member checks with participants to assure accuracy and enrich data collection; audit trails to have the opinion of an external evaluator; triangulation among data sources or data collection techniques; and maintaining reflexive. The peer review process starts once you have submitted your paper to a journal. This layout guide will help you format your manuscript to get it ready to submit to a Taylor & Francis or Routledge journal. All other articles have undergone strict editorial screening. Rights & Permissions. (1983) perceptual theory of. Peer review has several known limitations, but it is still an important and central institution in modern science (Seeber Citation 2022): findings that have not faced the test of peer review are seen as unreliable, while works that have passed the scrutiny of peer review assume a sort ‘truth’ status (Baldwin Citation 2018). (2012). The Best Paper Award is an annual prize awarded by the AAP, in connection with Routledge. Google Scholar. Writing a review of literature is to provide a. See the Article Guidelines for information about submitting different article types. news & offers. Peer-Review Resources; Open Special Issues; Open Access Statement; Frequently Asked Questions; Follow SCIRP. Peer review is intended to serve two primary purposes. 4) Sit in a quiet place and read the manuscript critically. To maintain this high quality of publishing, all Routledge books are peer-reviewed and manuscripts are worked on by our skilled production team, leaving our authors to concentrate on the writing. Peer review refers to the evaluation of a manuscript by an author’s peers, who are doctors and/or scientists belonging to the same area of research, clinical specialisation or subspecialisation. We welcome and publish contributions from across the world, with an editorial. (You can read more about what we publish here. Author details. All our Open Textbook content is hosted on our Taylor & Francis eBooks platform as well as sent to. His work and interests—both intellectual and professional—integrate built environment, economy, and technology to address contemporary urban transformation and sustainable development, with a focus on the Asia-Pacific region. DovePress are open access specialists with a focus on publishing medicine in a suite of peer-reviewed journals. Abstract. In your own words, summarize what the manuscript claims to report. [version 2; peer review: 1 approved, 1 approved with reservations] Shelly S. 207). An exploratory analysis of face-based impressions formed by cisgender, transgender and gender nonbinary individuals. Contact us +1 323-425-8868: [email protected] Review Integrity. Information Classification: GeneralThe Routledge Handbook on the Israeli- Palestinian Conflict offers a comprehensive and accessible overview of the most contentious and protracted political issue in the Middle East. Peer Review Policy: All research articles published in this journal have undergone rigorous double-blind peer review, based on initial editor screening and anonymized refereeing by at least two. December 08, 2022. Prices for individual chapters start from £1,250 / €1,500 / $1,563 (USD), plus tax. Grahe 3, Travis J. Forty-two of the reviewed articles reported that victims of cyber stalking and/or harassment experienced a. Recently, researchers have pushed the study of peer relations in. Lastly, checkmark the box next to “Scholarly. By Oliver Moore. Peer Learning in Higher Education. Peer review by invited experts, suggested by the authors, takes place openly after publication. Hardcover $282. 1st Edition. Terrible customer support. S. Abstract. Peer learning allows a positive use of differences between pupils, turning them into learning opportunities. 16. 1) Writing the Proposal. 2 As peer review requires complex and critical analytical skills, 2 it. First, read our guide to writing your review report then, choose the most appropriate checklist for the work you’ve been asked to review. The ever-increasing interest in work in oceanography and marine biology and its relevance to global environmental issues, especially global climate change and its impacts,. Conclusion: Peer collaborative learning combined with peer coaching provides opportunities for teams to learn and grow together, benefit from each other's expertise and experience, improve faculty morale, and provide more opportunities for collaborations between faculty. Peer tutor status and outcomes in primary mathematics (2009-10 - £80,059. Everything is by email. All articles in the peer-reviewed section have undergone anonymous double-anonymized review. Our efficient and rigorous peer review means you’ll get a decision on your manuscript in just 77 days. They often have advanced degrees in the field of the topic. Post-publication peer-review. To support this role, our Code of Conduct sets out the minimum standards for all Taylor & Francis/Routledge Editors who have responsibility for decisions on journal content to help ensure our. Publication office: Taylor & Francis, Inc. [version 1; peer review: 1 approved] Fabio Fasoli, Ivvy Divine, Aife Hopkins-Doyle. Peer Reviewers Maria Laura Bettinsoli and Andrea Scatolon. Advanced Photoshop Elements 7 for Digital Photographers. 2011, p. )We also post announcements about events and publications in. Peer review expectations and requirements will vary between different subject areas and article types, which is why we’ve prepared a number of different checklists to guide you through the process. Abingdon/New York: Routledge, 2004, 302 pp. Read the Instructions for Authors for information on how to submit your article. It’s a way of ensuring only articles of the highest quality, which describe sound research methods and results, are published. Login. 2006), Journalism, Science and Society (edited with M. 47) (collaboration with University of Stirling). co. Simon Bates is Routledge’s Editor responsible for commissioning books on topics relating to Sociology, Politics, History, and Geography from authors based in North- and South-East Asia. For example, I was not recognized when I signed in to access my resources (purchased textbook and supplemental materials). Journal editors are the gatekeepers for quality and responsible research content. Using Peer Tutoring to Improve Reading Skills is a very practical guide, offering a straightforward framework and easy-to-implement strategies to help teachers help pupils progress in reading. EDITORIAL Introducing a new Routledge Open Research collection: Digital Pedagogy [version 1; peer review: not peer reviewed] Tony Hall 1, Sarah Prestridge 2 1Designing Futures Programme & School of Education, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland 2School of Education & Professional Studies, Griffith University, Queensland, Australia First. Reviewing is a voluntary task, and a good peer reviewer approaches the job with intentionality. Kronick (1990), in his review of the use of peer review by eighteenth-century scienti c societies, argues that the Royal Society of London had peer review as part of its publication management process for its Medical Essays and Observations more than 20 years earlier. This book provides an in-depth insight into what is currently known and relatively unknown about youths’ online peer engagement. It is a requirement to maintain confidentiality and integrity of the peer review and editorial decision-making process at all stages, complying with data protection regulations (including GDPR). Accelerate the impact of your research with rapid publication, transparent post-publication peer review, and indexing in Scopus and PubMed. Bringing together a range of top experts from Israel, Palestine, Europe and North America the Handbook tackles a range of topics including: This Handbook provides. Motta, and Barry K. Whenever people discuss this issue they spout all kinds of ridiculous rubbish, much of it demonstrably untrue: that Routledge / Palgrave / Ashgate etc. *** Abstract: If early childhood educators know and appropriately use just one theory that is relevant to early childhood education, Bronfenbrenner's is the theory for them. Palgrave Macmillan peer reviews everything published in our academic programme. But semantic shift can also be understood in ways. The purpose of peer review is to evaluate the paper’s quality and suitability for publication. Abingdon, Oxon Routledge. Tieku is an award-winning author who has written, edited or co-edited five books, and published over 43 refereed book chapters, and journal articles, including The Legon School of International Relations, which won the 2021 British International Studies Association and the Review of International Studies Best Article Prize. The model has been disseminated nationwide in the educational sector. All of our books are peer-reviewed at proposal and/or manuscript stage by respected academic specialists who provide independent advice on the content, quality, and. December 08, 2022. Peer Review Policy: All papers submitted to Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education undergo a rigorous peer review process, beginning with an initial screening by the editor prior to anonymised scrutiny by at least two independent expert referees. Everything is by email. Page . After all, Routledge is not a university press. Due to this it is, at times, considered with less prestige, argues Tanya Golash-Boza an Associate Professor at University of California, Merced in ‘How to Publish an Academic Book – Why Choosing a Publisher is Important and How to Choose One’. The ever-increasing interest in work in oceanography and marine biology and its relevance to global environmental issues, especially global climate change and its impacts,. Peer Reviewers Maria Laura Bettinsoli and Andrea Scatolon. Read our growing portfolio of fully peer-reviewed open access books and chapters from CRC Press, available to read free online. This SLR studied the outcomes of gender stereotype change in the literature during the 1970–2020 period. Hu is the author of Megaregional China (2024), Reinventing. Religion is committed to the publication of significant, novel research, as well as review symposia and responses. New York and Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 2019, 202 Pages. Peer Review Policy: All research articles in Journal of Behavioral Finance have undergone rigorous peer review, based on initial editor screening and anonymous refereeing by two anonymous referees. of . Since its development by Carl Rogers in the 1940s, client-centered therapy has been a significant force in the world of humanistic psychotherapy. The literature search was conducted using the Scopus and EBSCOhost databases. Our BPC pricing is reviewed regularly. The peer review process is an integral part of academic publishing. For example: The New England Journal of Medicine used to pay $5 per review, until some reviewers complained that "if that was the price that this eminent journal placed on their opinion, the New England Journal of Medicine should seek referees elsewhere"; The Lancet. e. population and 13. It provides authoritative and up to date research-based reviews of transport related topics that are informative to those that are knowledgeable in the subject area. 1 Peer review policy. An exploratory analysis of face-based impressions formed by cisgender, transgender and gender nonbinary individuals. Peer Review: All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by. 1–2) defines policy practice as ‘efforts to change policies in legislative, agency, and community settings, whether by establishing new policies, improving existing ones or defeating policy initiatives of other. US. Important information on libel and defamation. Some believe that the core concept of inclusion only concerns specific groups or categories of people, whereas others maintain that inclusion involves everyone. 4. Double-blind peer review: Neither author nor reviewers know the identity of the other. Peer tutoring in Mathematics has reported academic benefits across many educational levels, from Preschool to Higher Education. By phone: Toll-Free Tel: 1 800 634 7064. Welcome to Aggregate's website for the publication, workshopping and discussion of research in architectural history and theory. Serving as editor of Community Development, the peer-reviewed journal of the Community Development Society, I was asked by Bruce Thyer, editor of Research on Social Work Practice, if I would like to exchange guest editorials. As a result, all submissions received from 1 August 2023 are subject to an article publication charge (APC) if accepted and published in the journal (unless a waiver is applied). ISBN 9780415809306 (hbk), 9780415809313 (pbk). To save even more time, our downloadable templates are a useful resource that can be used along with this guide to help you prepare your article for submission. 0 Chapter Introduction. Q. Visibility and Reach. Articles in both English and Spanish were included. As a medical ethicist with expertise in research ethics, he has increasingly devoted attention to education and research in the field of research integrity, with a specific interest in research culture and the definition of success in science. The Routledge Handbook of the Polar Regions is an authoritative guide to the Arctic and the Antarctic through an exploration of key areas of research in the physical and natural sciences and the social sciences and humanities. 1st Edition. In this lively and wide-ranging study, Bronwen Thomas explores how social media provides new ways of connecting with and rediscovering established literary works and authors while also facilitating the emergence of unique and distinctive forms of creative expression. Richard Hu is an urban planner and a megaproject manager. Routledge is not set up to provide timely customer support. For more information on the award, click here. A primary goal in the development of the scientific method lies in our ability to test hypotheses and communicate research findings in both a scientifically rigorous and replicable process, one that helps us to better understand human behaviors and promotes the exchanges of innovative ideas among scholars (Parks, 2020). 2019. Co-reviewing (sharing peer review assignments with senior researchers) is one of the best ways to learn peer review. This request was particularly appropriate, given recent. Book Review. Converting your book or chapter to open access after publication. The peer review system exists to validate academic work, helps to improve the quality of published research, and. The Editor of a journal plays a vital role in advancing knowledge within fields of research. The vast majority of book reviews are conducted in this manner. (2005). This review will consider three of these, although I should acknowledge that others are forthcoming, not least. For almost seventy-five years it has offered cutting-edge scholarly analyses of global issues in all phases of education, formal and informal, in order to rethink and shape the future of education. Robust peer review: your paper benefits from thorough review by experts in your field, with objective and constructive evaluation ahead of publication. We publish books and chapters across all subjects covered by Routledge, CRC Press and our other leading imprints in the humanities, social sciences, STEM and behavioural sciences. We also review the use of quasi-experimental designs in implementation science, and discuss the strengths and weaknesses of these approaches. The peer-review process for scientific professional journals serves two distinct purposes. PY - 2021/7/21. Exploring cultural dimensions as predictors of performance. The current review gathers together research investigating peer interaction skills in children with Developmental Language Disorder (DLD) to give an overview of the strengths and challenges experienced by these children when interacting with other children. This form of therapy is future-focused and prioritizes the discovery of current resources and strengths that the patient has, instead of fixating on the past or the problem. Sage Open utilizes a double-anonymized peer review process in which the reviewer and authors’ names and information are withheld from the other. Our science, technology, and medical books are published by the CRC Press and Productivity Press imprints, and our quality peer-reviewed journals are published under. It gives researchers a hands-on, practical understanding of the process. The goal of this review was to systematize empirical research that was published in peer-reviewed English-language journals between 1995 and 2015 on the prevalence, predictors, and implications of adolescents' use of pornography. It explores the particular contribution that educational technology can make to educational environments, focusing on empirical. An exploratory analysis of face-based impressions formed by cisgender, transgender and gender nonbinary individuals. In response to the challenges faced by the peer feedback, this research is to investigate how to develop peer feedback literacy, a much less discussed area from the previous research. This book offers the first. AU - Unerman, Jeffrey. 1 review. At Taylor & Francis we’ve been publishing open access journals since 2006, and in 2013 we complemented it with our Open Access Book Programme. 16 ebook, ISBN 9781138479920 - CAT# K348714. The realist review of 77 publications answered questions such as "what works, for whom, and in which circumstances" highlighting: the effectiveness and acceptance of transformational and collaborative approaches; professionalism, expertise, and good task delegation within operational teams; distributed leadership, relationships, and social. The article was originally a chapter in Oppression, Privilege, & Resistance edited by Lisa Heldke and Peg O’Connor (published byPeer Review Policy: All research articles in this journal have undergone rigorous peer review, based on initial editor screening and anonymized refereeing by at least two anonymous referees. The London Review of Education (LRE) is a fully open-access, peer-reviewed journal that provides a diversity of perspectives on all types, sectors and phases of education.